Back in 2013 when I first realized I was under surveillance, audio played not just a very large role but served multiple ends for those behind the conspiracy of which I was the focus. It would take me months to unravel. Years of forensic audio work (of which I had zero skill at the outset of my investigation) would allow me to remove noise from audio clips to reveal something amazing. Audio plays. It would then take more time to find a name for the phenomenon I had uncovered.
In early 2013 I moved into the home of my best friend in Los Angeles and his wife, Dr. Dohwa Kim, a professor at USC, gerontology physician and all around snappy dresser. My friend, Keith Breeden, knew that I felt I was under surveillance and so didn’t mind when I set up a cheap webcam with microphone on the second story balcony of the room I occupied while in his home.
Several months in and I had captured hundreds of hours of footage of what was Dr. Kim’s front yard and the street just beyond. Looking for people acting oddly or for some kind of evidence to support my claims were turning up nothing - out of the hundreds of hours of video I captured there. Perhaps one woman being weird and an old couple who stopped and seemed to point at my camera. And that was about it.
One day while reviewing video, not really paying attention, something in surveillance video caught my ear. Not my eye, as I had expected. Somehow I thought I heard the voice of the founder of SDI Industries, Don DeSanctis. His voice is quite noticeable and as I had worked for him for around15 years at that point I would know it anywhere. I scanned the video backward and replayed it for another listen. There had been silence until a car drove by along the street in front of the camera. When the vehicle noise appeared, so did vocalizations. The voice of Don DeSanctis boomed into existence and faded away as the car noise diminished to nothing.
If any of you have read my first two articles here on Substack, you would know this phenomenon happened in the apartment I had been driven out of. It happened here and there in motels I stayed in. Now here I was staying with friends and it had started happening there as well.
Noiseless nights at the Kim home were populated, the surveillance video’s audio would bear out, with brief appearances of voices that were always brought out of hiding by noise produced by cars, by helicopters moving overhead and so on. Keith had built his wife a koi pond that sat to the left and downward from my webcam’s microphone. The koi pond’s water fountain jets were put to good use by the engineers involved with this conspiracy and, no doubt, Breeden and Kim were well aware of the hardware deployed in their vicinity to make these ghostly vocalizations possible.
I began scanning my surveillance video for the best versions of vocalizations I could find. It would become easier as the longer my time at Dr. Kim’s home became the louder the “radio show” of voices would grow. So loud, in fact, that I once stood in the living room with Keith as the churning water jets produced very loud voices and asked, “You’re not going to say you don’t hear that, right?” He said nothing. Probably because he knew that I was recording every bit of it I could and was hard at work removing as much of the koi pond noise as possible to reveal the audio play that lied beneath it.
It took years of work when I showed a friend who has a history with radio and audio a sample video with untouched audio then the same exact video with the koi pond noise removed best I could. Uneducated wholly in these things I said, “It’s as if the voices aren’t there until noise appears. But I can barely hear it when the koi pond jets start trickling water and the same when they shut off. The voices must be there all the time because it’s not just koi pond water jets that free them, it could be any noise in the same video whether it’s the wind or a car’s engine. So any noise can bring them about.” He said, “Sounds like ‘Beat Frequency” to me. I looked it up and found it to be rather called Destructive Wave Interference phenomenon. And there was my answer.
An audio recording of these interacting voices, played on a loop, by a speaker or speakers in audio frequency ranges well above human hearing. Destructive wave interference occurs when two waves, in this case audio waves, collide with one another. The audio play that existed in high frequency bands were colliding with the constant noise of the koi pond water jets, therefore bringing entire frequency bands down into the range of human hearing.
Telling people in your orbit that you’re hearing voices, or anywhere else, for that matter, is never a good idea. If anyone came to me at work saying, “Keith says you’re hearing voices…” (which happened at least once since he worked there as a contractor and knew everyone I knew there) I would respond, “And recording them, at that.”
I realized I had big problem: I could only prove these voices existed if I could successfully remove most of the koi pond noise without harming the vocalizations that existed inside that noise. I worked for at least two years on perfecting these samples.
Don’t worry, I AM getting to the Havana Syndrome. But first, some samples from Dr. Kim’s home. I uploaded untouched video samples as well as those same samples denoised. You may have to play with your audio’s volume to hear them well but you’ll see I was successful in denoising these samples. What I found inside was a looped audio play that ran about an hour. The voices within that play are of people I worked with at SDI. Here I’ll present four samples with noise and denoised:
I have many samples which I will update this article with where passing, transient noise brings these voices out into the open but that means going through my database and backups looking through hundreds of hours of videos looking for these moments and editing them.
My article is in regards to the Havana Syndrome itself. I don’t believe it’s a conventional sonic weapon as some in intelligence, the media and elsewhere have suggested. I didn’t even link the Havana Syndrome to the audio aimed my way by a conspiracy who, I can tell you, didn’t have engineers create the audio play they did which no doubt took a good deal of time and money because there’s much more science into what they’d achieved than just clashing groups of audio frequencies at one another hoping for the best. It was when I saw an interview with a victim of the Havana Syndrome that pricked my ears up. She said something I hadn’t heard before. She also stated something I knew was more likely a culprit than high frequency sounds doing damage to her and her daughter’s auditory systems.
In NBC’s “Today” show Andrea Mitchell interviews the mother of Catherine Werner, a diplomat stationed in China. She states that her daughter called her with alarming news of “experiencing strange sounds and sensations in her apartment…” Werner’s mother traveled to China to see if her daughter was alright and experienced, “A very high pitched sound in Catherine’s bedroom and we heard a low pulsing sound in the living room…” This was the first time, in all the reports of Havana Syndrome accounts, I had heard anyone say, first, that two distinctly different kinds of sounds were heard in the same small space of an apartment, and secondly that the sound other than the high frequency noise was that of a ‘low rumbling’. Rumbling isn’t only a noise, it’s a feeling. For fear I will get kicked off YouTube and Substack, I’m giving you the link to the entire interview.
I believe the low frequency rumbling Werner’s mother reported to Mitchell is the actual business end of a Destructive Wave Interference weapon. For high frequency sounds to do the kind of damage as was done to Werner’s daughter - an odd looking concussion and inner ear damage - it seems that very powerful low frequency pulses would seem the far better culprit. High amplitude low frequency pulses would have a far greater effect on everything from the eardrum to the auditory nerve in the brain.
The low frequency high amplitude rumbling also most likely had no actual emitter. It was, in my current theory, the resultant outcome wave of two colliding high frequency waves. And the two high frequency audio waves would most likely be somewhere at opposite ends of the apartment Ms. Werner resided in. Probably in apartments on either side of her.
The high frequency noise Werner’s mother reports, to my mind, is part of the lower end of high frequency spectrum of the second audio wave, generated to collide with the much higher frequency bands so as to result in the low frequency “rumble” Werner’s mother reports. The high frequency sound she talks about is probably an after effect that cannot be done away with because the math in the science doesn’t allow it. It also doesn’t hurt that everyone in intelligence and the media seem to believe the high frequency noise is the culprit when, I believe, the culprit is far lower down the frequency scale.
If the tenants of the apartments on either side, or above and below Ms. Werner had powerful high frequency speakers aimed at one another to produce a third resultant, damaging low frequency wave, no amount of combing her apartment for an emitter would do. It’s a weapon that is the result that blossomed in the middle of her apartment because of colliding waves outside her apartment. And by the time it made the news, I would surmise, the high frequency audio gear outside her apartment was long since removed.
It’s only my theory and my experience with audio being used in ways that took years to divine that brings me to this conclusion.
My guess is that it IS an sonic weapon. Just not the kind they were thinking. And if China is to become the new Russia during Biden’s time in office I would guess Ms. Werner’s attack in China won’t be the last.
I'm both disturbed and delighted to read what you are writing about in such a concise and eloquent way as I too am a victim of this same program of involuntary experimentation and torture. I am disturbed but not at all surprised by your account. I was targeted many months prior to being made well aware that I was under direct surveillance and the direct neurological intervention technology was activated without doubt on Nov. 7 2010. I have much to comment on in your writing and would like to email you directly if possible. You can contact me at clandestinyclarity at g mail if you care to hear my findings in these matters. I have come to some different conclusions after spending the last 12 years or so completely obsessed with getting to the bottom of how this tech works so that I can demonstrate it to others and use it to undo what has been done to the thousands of us targeted individuals and so called 'havana syndrome' victims. A few things I'd like to say off the top are that while biotech companies may play role in this, be certain that it is the military/intel industrial simplex (yes, simplex) that is calling the shots. The biotech firms get their contracts from the govt. and answer to them and them only. Also Russia pioneered this tech and have more sophisticated tools than the US. Others countries who have this capability include China, Israel, Australia, UK, Germany and certainly many others. It did grow from the cochlear implant tech however now encompasses all senses. It also doesn't require surgical implantation of a device. Anyway keep up the good writing I hope you get your story out far and wide because It is about time we cut the cables and turned the tables.. AJJay